Unveiling the Mystery: Signs of the Zodiac 13 and the Forgotten Serpent Bearer

signs of the zodiac 13

The Zodiac Controversy That Refuses to Fade

Every few years, a story resurfaces online that sends a ripple of panic through the astrology community. It suggests that everything we know about our horoscopes is wrong, proposing that there are actually 13 signs of the zodiac, not 12.

This recurring debate centers on a forgotten constellation and challenges the very foundation of Western astrology. It leaves many wondering if their zodiac sign has been incorrect all along. This article delves into the heart of the controversy surrounding the signs of the zodiac 13 to separate fact from fiction.

Meet Ophiuchus: The Serpent Bearer Between Scorpio and Sagittarius

At the center of this cosmic debate is a constellation known as Ophiuchus, the Serpent Bearer. From an astronomical standpoint, the Sun passes through Ophiuchus for about 18 days each year, from approximately November 29th to December 17th.

This places it between the familiar signs of Scorpio and Sagittarius. In mythology, Ophiuchus is often associated with Asclepius, the Greek god of medicine, who was said to possess the power to heal and even raise the dead. He is depicted as a man grasping a large serpent, which represents healing and renewal.

How the Signs of the Zodiac 13 Debate Started

The idea of a 13-sign zodiac is not new. It first gained some traction in 1970 when an astrologer named Steven Schmidt proposed a 14-sign zodiac, which included Ophiuchus and another constellation, Cetus.

However, the debate exploded into the mainstream in 2011. A statement from NASA, intended to clarify the difference between astronomy and astrology, explained that the Earth’s axis has wobbled, changing the apparent position of the constellations. This led many media outlets to incorrectly report that NASA had discovered a 13th zodiac sign, reigniting the Ophiuchus controversy.

Understanding the Difference Between Constellations and Zodiac Signs

A crucial point is often lost in this discussion: astronomical constellations and astrological signs are not the same thing. Constellations are physical groupings of stars in the night sky, and they vary widely in size and shape.

Astrological signs, on the other hand, are a human-made system. Western astrology divides the ecliptic—the Sun’s apparent path through the sky—into 12 equal sections of 30 degrees each. These 12 neat slices form the zodiac signs we know, providing a symmetrical and symbolic framework.

Why Traditional Astrology Maintains 12 Signs

Ancient astrologers were fully aware of the 13th constellation, Ophiuchus. They made a conscious decision to use a 12-sign system for its symbolic and mathematical elegance. The number 12 aligns perfectly with the 12 months of the year.

Furthermore, it divides cleanly into four elements (fire, earth, air, water) and three modalities (cardinal, fixed, mutable). This creates a balanced and harmonious system that has been the bedrock of Hellenistic astrology for thousands of years. Ophiuchus was simply left out to maintain this order.

What Would Change If We Adopted the Signs of the Zodiac 13

For a moment, let’s entertain the hypothetical. If Ophiuchus were added to the zodiac, the dates for every other sign would shift. For example, Scorpios would be much rarer, and many people would find their sign changed to the one before it.

Those born between November 29th and December 17th would become Ophiuchans. Their personality traits would likely be a blend of Scorpio’s passion and intensity with Sagittarius’s adventurous and knowledge-seeking spirit. However, this remains a purely theoretical exercise, as the astrological community has not adopted this change.

The Final Verdict on the 13th Zodiac Sign

So, is the 13th zodiac sign real? As a constellation, yes, Ophiuchus is very real. But as an astrological sign in the Western zodiac, the answer is no. The system of 12 signs is a symbolic tradition, not a literal map of the heavens.

You can rest easy knowing your zodiac sign has not changed. The debate over the signs of the zodiac 13 is a fascinating intersection of astronomy and history, but it doesn’t alter the ancient art of astrology that continues to be practiced today.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post
Next Post